Show more

在赫尔辛基跟家里视频:“我觉得这跟东北差不多~”
一个路人东北口音飘过:“那还是差挺多的。”

和00-09年比起来,10年代可能真的算不上一个好的十年:政治气候让人失望,技术创新也没有什么大的突破。十年里最让人兴奋的硬件大概是10年的iPhone 4。从内容的角度上来讲,互联网,特别是中文互联网从开放一步步走向封闭,大量有价值的内容被封闭在微信微博知乎的登录门槛之外,少数平台提供商对舆论渠道有了绝对的控制权。“全网删帖”在2010年恐怕是难以想象的事情。

相比之下,让人兴奋的事情可能是两件:视频内容的大爆发,让外语学习比任何时候都简单;特斯拉的成功让环保的概念更深入人心。

感觉“沃霍尔和李子柒”是一个挺好的高考作文题目。

t.co/huYFm7otMi t.co/8ad7kkRk2B
有趣的是,我朋友圈转发这两篇文章的,很大程度上是重叠的。

And Sondland's line was he _presumed_ a condition for the meetings, etc. So he had goodwill but was ignorant. Both are carefully chosen positions. But Volker's explanation has a larger wiggle room. As Volker could claim that he did not see or engage any quid-pro-quo, it's only about changing the optics of the Ukraine government. In reality, both *probably* knew what's going on. However, their position can make it hard to pin this on Trump directly. 2/2

Show thread

So basically, Kurt Volker's line was "I pushed the Ukrainians to say they will investigate the Burisma, because I thought it would assure the POTUS that Ukraine was serious in their _anti-corrupt_ efforts."

From his point of view, he was only helping the UKR to counter an unfavorable view of POTUS with a stmt, so a) he did not know where the unfavorable view came from b) the only reason he thought why the stmt needed to mention Burisma/2016 was it'd impress the POTUS. 1/2

Really bad day to be busy - sounds like the testimony is _mildly_ interesting.

交大和复旦的学生争相在领导人行程报道下面点赞,不乏我认识的同学好友。

sigh.

So no Medicare for all candidates can say one simple thing clear - employer-based insurance is annoying for everyone, and single payer gives government more power to negotiate. Is that really so hard to say or so risky to say?

有的时候呢想想很多事情真的不知道是为什么。比如说我上学的时候一直对读万卷书行万里路的后半句不是很感兴趣,导致今天很多时候国家名字和地图还对不上号。以我上学的时候碰到的出色地理老师的数量来说,真的还挺不好意思的。

My view on Greta Thunberg builds on one thing: are we doing enough about climate change? If not so, what exactly is the harm about climate gaining some attention via protests and symbolic movements?
2/2

Show thread

Many attacks about Greta Thunberg point to her "bringing no real solution". In fact, Sweden and nearby airlines recorded a reduction in travelers partially because of climate protests. Educating people about the climate IS part of the solution.t.co/9WQqmEK1xe?amp=1
The problem of climate is more than "We need a solution." Some solutions, like hybrid cars, existed for a long time. It's also about people and the government's unwillingness to act. 1/2

今日最佳:

“怎么学投资方法?”
“去看CFA教材。”
“太复杂了,不如去北京玩一个礼拜,去哪里都打车。”

北大说被退档考生成绩太差跟不上,退档是为了考生好,让我想起来这么一件事。

美国南北战争的时候南方的指挥官罗伯特•李认为奴隶制是一种“道德上和政治上的邪恶”。但是他为什么要跟废奴主义者作战呢?因为他觉得“黑人在这里得到的痛苦的训练对他们种族的成长是有利的”,所以白人在帮黑人的忙,而让黑人自由是对他们不好的。

你看,不管什么时候,不管什么样的歧视,都能以“我是为了弱势群体好,不然他们自己跟不上”的理由,堂而皇之的出现。罗伯特李想不起来问一问黑奴愿不愿意被奴役,北大招生办也想不起来问一问考生自己到底愿意做什么选择。

其实冠冕堂皇的理由下面到底是什么动机,谁都明白。

04年之前,虽然非法移民是犯罪,但这条法律从来没被执行过。

在场10个总统候选人没有一个能想起来这个吗…

b) Obama administration forfeited public option to get support for the ACA, it got attacked, became a political liability and caused Dems two elections, and got repealed anyway.

c) Clinton had a relatively moderate platform. It's not like she won the presidency. d) And look like what happened to the moderates on the right like Kasich. So tell me, why should someone on the left trust this time would be different?

Show thread

So, I've been reading a lot of commentaries saying "Y'all Dems better not pursue Medicare for all or you'll lose the moderate votes". Look, Not that I am particularly fond of medicare for all, but the logic from the supporters is not that hard to understand:
a) There are countries that have universal healthcare and it seems working. 1/

几段历史:

* 罗斯福上台至尼克松赢得第一任选举期间(32-68),民主党赢得了9场总统选举中的七场。
* 这期间南部各州是民主党的铁票仓。
* 然而这并不是一个“白左”的时代。这个时期两党都有社会政策意义上的保守翼和自由翼。国会基本上由保守翼控制:南部各州农村支持种族隔离的民主党人和北方的共和党人组成的联盟从38年到64年控制着国会。
* 这个时期的共和党是少数族裔权益和黑人平权运动的支持者,而民主党参议员们反而坚决反对1964年的平权法案。
* 大逆转发生在1968年,这一年尼克松赢得了南方几个民主党铁票仓的选票,从此以后南部各州慢慢成为共和党的铁票仓。而共和党也开始慢慢丢掉少数族裔的选票。
* 尼克松的主要政纲包括 - 坚持州权必须要得到保障,反对福利国家,抑制边境犯罪,反对强行整合黑白学区。听起来很耳熟?那就对了。

Show more
Cats on hoppinglife.com

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!